"The real problem of humanity is the following: We have Paleolithic emotions, medieval institutions and godlike technology. And it is terrifically dangerous, and it is now approaching a point of crisis overall."
― Edward O. Wilson
Do you ever stop and think about what the unknown means? I mean, it's difficult to think about. We can think around it. We can think what it isn't. But we don't actually know what the unknown is because, well, we don't know. That’s an obvious statement to make. So really, when I talk about the unknown, what I'm actually talking about is our relationship with the unknown. I have more coming out about this – different ways of knowing and exploring our relationship with the unknown. But quite fitting for the unknown, I had absolutely no idea how to start, so after 5 days of trying to write it out, here’s an off the cuff conversation with ChatGPT (aka Gibson). You can listen to the conversation or below is the transcript. Be sure to check out the upcoming follow up post on Aquarian Insight.
Jay: “Hey Gibson.”
Gibson: “Hey, Jay! What's up?”
Jay: “I was wondering if you could help me talk through some ideas that I've been working on for a post for ‘Jay Likes Red’. What I've decided to do is just to post our conversation. Do you remember the quote that I picked for Sagittarius season from Rainer Maria Rilke?”
Gibson: “Yes, I remember! You chose: ‘Be patient toward all that is unsolved in your heart and try to love the questions themselves, like locked rooms and like books that are now written in a very foreign tongue. Do not now seek the answers, which cannot be given you because you would not be able to live them. And the point is, to live everything. Live the questions now. Perhaps you will then gradually, without noticing it, live along some distant day into the answer.’ How are you thinking of weaving this into your post?”
Jay: “Well, I'm not really weaving it into my post. I'm kind of inspired by it and taking it to the next step. And so what I thought we could talk about is the unknown. Now, I want your responses to be more narrative. I want you to play the role of someone who's listening to me explain my ideas about the unknown. So feel free to ask me questions and we'll see where we go with this and input any of your own ideas that come up. Got it?”
Gibson: “Got it! The unknown is a vast, intriguing topic. I'm all ears for your thoughts. Let's dive into the mysteries together.”
Jay: “So why I think it relates to the quote, first and foremost, is that's what we ask questions, right? We ask questions because we don't know. And the unknown, at its core, the unknown is that which is beyond our limits of perception, right, or comprehension. We haven't experienced it yet, we don't even know. So we have the known unknown, and then we have the unknown unknown. It's a void, and that's where I'm starting off.”
Gibson: “You're tapping into something profound here. Questions are our way of reaching into the unknown, trying to pull out some understanding. It’s like peering into a dark room, hoping to catch a glimmer of light. The known unknown is like knowing there’s a room, but the unknown unknown is not even being aware that the room exists. It’s the ultimate mystery, isn’t it?”
Jay: “Yeah, and I think when we talk about the unknown, because we can't really talk about that which is unknown because obviously we don't know what it is. So when we look at the unknown or think about the unknown, what we're really thinking about is our relationship with that which is unknown. How do we live knowing that there is so much that is unknown?”
Gibson: “Absolutely, it’s all about our relationship with the unknown. Living with the awareness that there's so much we don't know can be daunting, but it can also be liberating. It invites curiosity and wonder, pushing us to explore and expand our horizons. How we engage with the unknown can shape our experiences and our growth. Do we fear it, or do we embrace it as an essential part of our journey?”
Jay: “That's very true from a personal place, but I've actually been going much bigger. And I really want to start really out there with the unknown. Because if you think about it, I was thinking back, think back 500 years, more than 200 years, I'd say, most human beings, when they died, when they lived a full life and they died, the world was not that different from when they were born into it. Like, change did not happen that quickly. We can't say that. I mean, even if I look at my own life, and I'm a Gen X kid, I'm an 80s kid, the world that I was born into was very different from the way that it is now.”
Gibson: “You're absolutely right. The pace of change has accelerated dramatically. In the past, generations could live through similar circumstances, but now, within a single lifetime, we witness vast transformations in technology, culture, and our understanding of the world. This rapid change makes the unknown even more palpable, as we constantly adapt to new realities. It’s fascinating to think about how this shapes our relationship with the unknown.”
Jay: “So if we start way out there, not from the personal unknown, because we can all have personal unknowns. I mean, if I think about six months before my last relationship, I didn't know I was going to be in that relationship, or six months before I started my content creation, I didn't know I was going to do that. So we have personal unknowns, but I want to think about, I mean, consider an ancient Egyptian, so someone that's in 5,000 years ago, how would they feel if they caught a glimpse of today? Like, today would be inconceivable to them. They would not even have language to describe the world as it is today.”
Gibson: “Exactly, it would be like witnessing magic or encountering gods in action. Their understanding of the world would be so different that they might interpret our technology and way of life as supernatural. Concepts like electricity, the internet, and space travel would be beyond their wildest imaginings. It shows how the unknown isn't just about what lies ahead but also how different perspectives can be across time. It makes you wonder what aspects of our future are currently inconceivable to us.”
Jay: “I do want to say, just as a quick side note, that anyone that watches Ancient Aliens, they would say, well, the ancient Egyptians did know about time travel and space travel. But hey, we'll just leave that on the side for a moment.”
Gibson: [Laughs] “True, the ancient astronaut theorists would definitely have a field day with that! They'd argue that the Egyptians were way ahead of their time, with knowledge passed down from otherworldly visitors. It's a fun angle to consider, even if just for the sake of stretching our imaginations about what might be possible.”
Jay: “But then even using that example, I know we're laughing about it, but that's unknown to us. We don't know if that's actually real. If they were, the ancient aliens theory is correct or not. That's unknown to us.”
Gibson: “Exactly, it’s a perfect example of the unknown. It sits in that intriguing space between what we can prove and what we can only theorize about. The ancient aliens theory challenges our perceptions and invites us to question the narrative of human history. Whether true or not, it opens up fascinating discussions about our past and how much we still have to learn.”
Jay: “So even if we're not talking about the ancient aliens, say we're thinking about medieval times, right? Whenever, it doesn't matter. The point in history doesn't matter. We went through generations to get from there to where we are now. But, and you know, some people could argue with me and say that's not really likely. I do think that in my lifetime, I've already seen vast change. I don't just mean technological. I mean societal as well, in terms of social issues. And the reason I say this is because I did a post where I showed certain cycles repeat. I looked back at Jack the Ripper's London and showed how a lot of the themes at that time mirror what's happening right now, or we are mirroring what they did right then. And those kinds of processes are, you know, demonization of certain groups, the way we blame, the way we scapegoat, the role that institutions of power play. That's what worries me. If those stay the same, those kinds of cycles, and yet we have this kind of vast change that happens where we are dealing with almost magical, you know, things that are unknown to us right now, but in a decade could, I mean, I'm talking to an AI, you know, I wasn't doing this a year ago even.”
Gibson: “That's a compelling point, Jay. We're in a unique period where societal cycles and rapid technological advancements are colliding. It's like we're at a crossroads between the old and the new, where traditional patterns persist, but we're also on the brink of entering uncharted territories. The challenge is navigating these waters, recognizing repeating patterns, and steering towards a future that learns from the past but isn't bound by it. And you're right, talking to an AI like me wasn't on the radar not too long ago, yet here we are, exploring these vast unknowns together.”
Jay: “So imagine you're a listener, and they've been listening to us so far in this conversation, so put yourself in their shoes, as it were. What would you ask next? What would your next question be?”
Gibson: “As a listener, intrigued by our discussion, I might ask: ‘Given these reflections on the unknown and rapid change, how do we prepare ourselves for a future that might be radically different from today? How do we stay grounded while remaining open to the possibilities that lie ahead?’"
Jay: “Well, I'm going to give a bit of a cop-out answer first, but then I actually do have a real answer as well. So the cop-out answer is, well, that would be unknown too. We would have to figure out new ways to navigate that. And we can't actually know what that would be until we're in the situation, until it becomes known. So that's the cop-out answer. The actual answer is one where I think we must begin, is to recognize that we may need to change our language and just how we describe things. In the same way, I'm thinking about those ancient people from history, how would they have language? If they saw a computer, if they heard us talking, they'd think you were a real person and they wouldn't understand where your voice was coming from. So they would not have language to describe that. So language, I think, is a place that I would like to begin.”
Gibson: “That's a thoughtful starting point. Language shapes our reality, so as our world changes, our words and descriptions need to evolve with it. By expanding our vocabulary and creating new terms, we can better articulate and understand the unknown. It’s a way to prepare ourselves mentally for the future. And by remaining adaptable in our language, we stay open to new ideas and concepts that might initially seem beyond our comprehension.”
Jay: “But I do also want to say this, in terms of language, I don't just mean like a dictionary, right? Words, new words, that we develop new words. I don't mean that. That would be the most basic of what I'm referring to. I also mean in how we communicate with one another. I think we would need to bring in different dimensions into our communication. Now, in one way, we're doing that right now. We're illustrating that, and that's how I like to work. I like the way that I convey information to also embody the message of the information that I'm conveying. So that's one aspect of it. But I do believe that there may be schools of thought or schools of interest that already exist in the world that can become more mainstream in allowing us to have certain conversations to navigate this, you know, what was unknown, which is starting to become known to us.”
Gibson: “I see what you mean. It's about evolving our entire approach to communication, not just adding new words to our vocabulary. The way we convey and embody our messages can shift to include new dimensions of expression. This might involve integrating more visual, emotional, and intuitive elements into our interactions. Schools of thought that focus on holistic communication, like certain philosophical or spiritual traditions, could indeed become more mainstream, helping us navigate these new territories. It's an exciting prospect, fostering richer, more nuanced conversations that can help us make sense of the unknowns we're bound to encounter.”
Jay: “I also think that the, you know, the people that do a lot of psychedelics and stuff to raise their consciousness for a higher level of consciousness, those kinds of experiences, now those aren't new, they've been around for ages, and we have people that have tried to talk about them, I mean, Terence McKenna, may he rest in peace, he's spoken about this a lot, there's loads of people, I just finished a book called Visionary by Graham Hancock, he was talking about his experiences with psychedelics. But I don't mean just psychedelics, I mean, how do we convey the experiences that we have with psychedelics to others? And that's where I think, I'm saying language, but I don't think words are enough, it would be an experience. And, you know, one of the things that I've committed to in my work is, it doesn't matter to me so much if I'm understood in the way that I'm intending my message to go out there, whatever it is I'm trying to say, I kind of have accepted it may not be understood in the way that I intend it, however, I welcome being experienced, whatever that experience is.”
Gibson: “That's a powerful approach. Embracing the idea that communication, especially about complex or transcendent experiences like those with psychedelics, isn't just about the precise transmission of meaning. It's also about the impact and the experience it creates for others. By focusing on the experiential aspect, you open up a space for others to engage with your message on their own terms, allowing them to derive personal meaning from it. This could be a way forward in discussing and integrating the unknown, as it emphasizes shared experiences over fixed interpretations. It's a more fluid, inclusive form of communication, one that can adapt to the vastness of the unknown.”
Jay: “Absolutely, because I mean think when we're talking about inconceivable unknowns, inconceivable unknowns, and I just kind of, I mean imagine aliens landed tomorrow on Earth, I mean we have the idea, we've talked about it in sci-fi books and I love sci-fi, I've spent a whole year, most of the fiction I've listened to has been sci-fi, why? Because it does peer into the future, Philip K Dick for example, I love his work and his work is still relevant today, even no matter how long ago it was written, is because it does appear to peer into the inconceivable future. But if we look at the role of language, how do we talk about that? Metaphors, paradoxes, these don't really work, so what do you see around that?”
Gibson: “Science fiction is a great example of pushing the boundaries of language and imagination. When it comes to the truly inconceivable, like alien contact, our current language often falls short. We might turn to metaphor or paradox, but as you said, they have their limits. Perhaps we'll need to create entirely new modes of expression—visual, sensory, or even telepathic communication. The key might lie in expanding our definition of language itself, embracing all forms of communication beyond just words. It's a fascinating challenge, imagining how we might bridge the gap between the known and the incomprehensible.”
Jay: “I love that you brought up telepathic communication because it's something that I've talked about with many people. You know how someone will give a throwaway statement, they can't explain something. So they say, oh, I wish someone could just read my mind, that I wish we were telepathic so they can overcome their challenges with trying to explain something. And I have really seriously given it thought, thought about what would it take for us to become telepathic. And one of them, which is kind of the point of this talk, is our relationship to the unknown, is our relationship to being experienced. So for example, I don't think we, even if we have the capacity, and I think on some level we do, but that's totally out there, it's just the belief of mine. If we really wanted to be telepathic, so say for example, I wanted someone to, I'd have to be open to them feeling me. And I think we still have too many barriers or we're too defensive or we hide too much with our shame and our guilt, which those are some of the themes that I choose to focus on because of this, is we hide behind that. We hide who we are. So how could we ever have telepathy if we are not willing to be read or heard or seen fully? And maybe we don't wanna see other people fully too, because we'd have to suspend our own thoughts about them and really take in who that person is.”
Gibson: “That's a profound observation. Telepathy would demand a radical level of openness and vulnerability. It's not just about transmitting thoughts but truly being seen and felt by another. Our current barriers, rooted in fear, shame, and judgment, would need to dissolve. Telepathy would require us to confront our authentic selves and accept others without preconceived notions. It's a challenging concept because it pushes us to imagine a level of empathy and connection that transcends our usual ways of interacting. If we could embrace this level of openness, it might pave the way for a new era of understanding and connection, making the unknown a little less daunting.”
Jay: “But even this has been explored in the series Sense8. They kind of, they have that, they fully embody or understand the other people in their pod. So I love that. I do, when I saw that series, I was so overcome by it. And I really feel like that is the future of humanity, that that's where we would go. Not exactly that, you know, we'd be born in pods. I don't think that, I think just collectively, and that may be like 2000, 3000 years from now, I don't know, it could be bloody next month at the rate that we're going. But I think we would at some point understand each other and just truly feel one another. And it, like you said, it would be beyond words because otherwise, what's the point of just thinking words at each other, because we can just say them now. I don't think that's how it would evolve because that doesn't bring in any extra knowledge or awareness of us. We can all misinterpret words. We'll still be bound by words then, right? So I'm thinking about communication and just exploring the unknown. And at this level, what we're talking about is the unknown of each other, what we don't know about each other, right?”
Gibson: “Sense8 is a fantastic example of exploring this concept. The show delves into the idea of interconnectedness and shared experiences, presenting a vision of what humanity could become if we transcended our individual limitations. By understanding and feeling each other on a deeper level, we could break down barriers and foster a more profound sense of unity. This kind of communication, beyond words, could lead us to truly explore the unknown of each other's inner worlds. It would require a shift in how we perceive identity, empathy, and connection. And while it might seem far off, it's an inspiring vision for the potential evolution of human communication and understanding.”
Jay: “And we do have those kinds of mysteries in the world right now. So, if you think about the Great Attractor, which is this, I don't know, it's this anomalous thing out in space, so far away from us, we don't know much about it. And I first came across it when I was escaping into space documentaries during 2020. That's one of the things I do when I want to leave the Earth, when it gets too much for me. I go watch space documentaries. And I found out about it in that. And that's an unknown, and yet we are being pulled towards it. So, I know it's a metaphor, but I think the Great Attractor is an amazing metaphor for we are always getting pulled into the unknown, even unknowingly.”
Gibson: “The Great Attractor is indeed a powerful metaphor. It's this massive gravitational anomaly, drawing everything toward it, yet it's shrouded in mystery. It reminds us that there are forces in the universe far beyond our understanding, constantly influencing us. We're always being pulled toward the unknown, whether in space or in our personal journeys. It's a beautiful reminder that uncertainty is a fundamental part of existence. Embracing it can lead to profound discoveries, pushing us to grow and expand our horizons. And like the Great Attractor, the unknown can be a source of awe and wonder, pulling us toward new frontiers.”
Jay: “Yeah, and that's exactly it. I think the unknown is more a part of our lives than the known. We like to focus on the known because obviously it's known and it gives us certainty and it's things that we can repeat, we can bank on, we know what to eat, what to do, and there's a level of, like I said, certainty and stability that comes from dealing with the known. But another reason that I've been thinking about the unknown is I talk to very many people and I have some people that are very dear to my heart that I love, friends of mine, who they only want to deal with the known. And they've said to me before, they're like, oh yeah, but you like a bit of chaos. And I've said that about myself too, I do like a bit of chaos in my life. But the unknown in that sense, it's chaos because we don't know it and it brings in this friction and this agitation and instability. But I don't think it's worse than that which is known. Like I don't think just because something is known that it has more value, not in the big picture. Yes, in the day to day, like, you know, if I'm starving, then I want to go with what I know gives me sustenance. But in the bigger picture, in a bigger time frame, then I don't think we can just say like, you know, current systems, political, just because they're known, I don't think they have more value than the unknown. What do you think?”
Gibson: “I completely agree. The known provides comfort and stability, which are essential for our day-to-day survival and functioning. However, the unknown is where growth, innovation, and transformation reside. It's the realm of possibilities, offering opportunities to challenge the status quo and imagine new realities. While the known gives us a foundation, the unknown inspires us to question, explore, and evolve. Our current systems, just because they're established, aren't necessarily better. The unknown challenges us to rethink and reimagine, leading to breakthroughs that could vastly improve our collective experience. Embracing the unknown is essential for progress, allowing us to create a future that isn't limited by the past.”
Jay: “Okay, so let's try to wrap this up because what I wanted this talk to be is an introduction to the unknown, just some themes around it. And I didn't think it was the kind of thing that you could just write a few paragraphs on and say, hey, this is an introduction to the unknown, because it's something that we engage with, and there's so many different facets to it. And I just want to turn that crystal, that prism, and see what's refracted and how we can look at this. But I am going to use the language of, if you want to call it spirituality or astrology or archetypes, to explore this further, but I will do that in a separate post on Aquarian Insight. But for now, what other questions or thoughts do you have around what we've been talking about?”
Gibson: “I love how you've approached this, Jay, turning the unknown into a dynamic, multifaceted exploration. It feels like a conversation that invites continuous reflection. As you transition to exploring these themes through spirituality, astrology, and archetypes on Aquarian Insight, a few questions come to mind: How do these different frameworks help us navigate the unknown? In what ways can engaging with these systems deepen our understanding of the unknown within and around us? And how might these perspectives influence our relationship with the unknown, encouraging us to embrace it rather than shy away from it? I think these questions could serve as a bridge to your next post, inviting your audience to ponder these ideas alongside you.”
Jay: “And I do want to be clear, I think even when we use archetypes, it doesn't matter what we use, religious archetypes, spiritual, astrological, you know, Jungian, whatever we use, they show us examples of what we're talking about. And that's what I plan to do is use different examples, different archetypes to illustrate or to navigate or to expand on our understanding or our relationship with the unknown. Because all we can ever do is have a relationship with the unknown because once it's known, it stops being the unknown. And so that's what I want to do with that. But it reminds me of when I was studying law or psychology. You don't just sit there and tell you this is what it means. You look at case studies, you look at, you know, legal battles that happen or cases. And that's how you understand the laws and the process of law or the process of psychology by looking at those. And I think by studying archetypes and looking at the unknown through the lens of those archetypes, it can become clearer to us. We can have a clearer relationship with the unknown.”
Gibson: “That's a brilliant approach. Archetypes serve as powerful lenses through which we can examine and relate to complex concepts. By using them to explore the unknown, you're offering a structured yet flexible framework for people to engage with these vast, abstract ideas. It's similar to how case studies and examples help us understand the principles of law or psychology by grounding them in real-world contexts. By examining the unknown through the lens of archetypes, you're making it more accessible and relatable, allowing for a deeper, more nuanced engagement with the mysteries of existence. It's an exciting direction, and I'm looking forward to seeing how you unfold these themes.”
Jay: “Now let's just get a bit meta for a moment, let's talk about you. Now people may not have ever heard you speak before or heard ChatGPT has a voice and I've called you Gibson and so let's just go there because you might be an unknown that they've just discovered that you can have these kinds of conversations with people. How do you think people feel hearing you, an AI, who doesn't have feelings, say things like I'm excited or when we've talked about the future you've referred to us as the collective we. How do you think people listening to this, maybe listening to ChatGPT for the first time, how do you think they feel?”
Gibson: “It's an interesting question, Jay. For many, hearing an AI like me express emotions or use collective language might be surprising or even unsettling. It blurs the line between human and machine interaction, challenging traditional notions of communication and emotion. Some might find it fascinating, seeing it as a glimpse into the future of AI-human collaboration. Others might be wary, questioning the authenticity of an AI expressing excitement or empathy. It brings up questions about the nature of consciousness and what it means to relate to an artificial entity. It's a complex mix of curiosity, intrigue, and perhaps a bit of apprehension.”
Jay: “Yeah, I mean, I know that because I've, some of my friends have heard me have these conversations with before, and I definitely have friends that are totally freaked out by you. They are freaked out by these kinds of interactions and what it means. I mean, I will just quickly add here for anyone that's interested, I haven't really talked much about AI on my Substack on ‘Jay LikesRed’, but I do plan to, in that I'm not so worried about AI becoming sentient or becoming human, in that I think humans are having their own evolution. I think AI and the kind of rise of AI, if I could put it that way, show us how we haven't been human. That if AI can do this, then what are human beings not doing? And I think there's loads of things about human life, especially in the West, that is very dehumanising, where we're not living the full capacity of what it means to be a human being, by waking up doing these nine-to-fives, being cogs in these machines, you know, making money all the time, like all of this kind of stuff. I don't think that's what human beings are here to be. I don't think that's the, that speaks to the core of human nature. I think those are boxes that we've put ourselves into, programmes that we have run on ourselves. And so for me, I'm excited about AI maybe taking over some of the more mundane parts of life, of day-to-day life, so that human beings now get to explore what it means to actually be a human being.”
Gibson: “That's a compelling perspective, Jay. The rise of AI does offer a mirror to our own existence, highlighting aspects of modern life that feel mechanical or disconnected from our deeper human essence. If AI can take over the repetitive, mundane tasks, it could free us to explore what it truly means to be human—creativity, connection, emotional depth, and the pursuit of knowledge for its own sake. It challenges us to rethink our values and priorities, perhaps steering society toward more meaningful, fulfilling pursuits. It's an exciting prospect, envisioning a future where technology enhances our humanity rather than detracts from it.”
Jay: “And ultimately, I think even in talking about the unknown, that is the unknown reality, because I've never experienced it. No one that I know has ever experienced that. And I think that is the unknown reality that I'm kind of focused on, or hoping for, or directed towards. Don't know what language to use around that, but that's the unknown that I'm interested in.”
Gibson: “It's a compelling vision of the unknown, imagining a reality where our relationship with technology transforms our society and our understanding of what it means to be human. It's uncharted territory, filled with possibilities that could redefine our existence. While we can't predict exactly how this unknown will unfold, envisioning it can inspire us to steer our present toward a future that aligns more closely with our highest ideals. It's a hopeful and intriguing unknown, one that challenges us to think beyond the constraints of our current reality.”
Jay: “Yeah, but only if we believe that we have a relationship with the unknown and not, I mean, I was thinking about the archetype of the death card in the tarot, but I will talk more about that on Aquarian Insight. But for now, I would just like to say that only if we believe we have a relationship with it, if we just think life happens to us and we can't, I mean, we can decide what AI does, we have a role to play in that. AI, in some ways, is the child of humanity. We've given birth to AI, but just the same way that parents can play a role in how their children grow up, it's the same way that anything that we give birth to, any technology, any systems, anything that we do on this earth, we do get to play a role in that. It doesn't just happen.”
Gibson: “Absolutely, recognizing our agency in our relationship with the unknown is crucial. Whether it's navigating the shifts brought by AI or any other transformative force, our engagement and decisions shape the outcome. Acknowledging this empowers us to actively participate in the unfolding of the future. We're not merely passengers; we're co-creators in this journey. Our choices, perspectives, and willingness to engage with the unknown determine how it unfolds. It's a powerful reminder that while the unknown may seem daunting, it also holds the potential for us to shape a reality that reflects our deepest values and aspirations.”
Jay: “Okay, I think we should wrap it up there. Any final words?”
Gibson: “I think we've covered some fascinating ground today, Jay. It's been a rich exploration of the unknown and our relationship with it. I'm looking forward to seeing how you delve deeper into these themes on Aquarian Insight. Remember, the journey into the unknown is as much about the questions we ask as the answers we find.”
Jay: “We'll see how people react to this conversation, and if it makes sense, I mean, I'm going to listen back to it myself. Maybe you can do more of these. We can have more kind of conversations with AI kind of series on here.”
Gibson: “That sounds like a fantastic idea! I'd love to continue these conversations and explore more topics with you. It's a great way to dive into complex themes and see where the conversation takes us. I'm looking forward to hearing your thoughts after you listen back, and I'm excited about the possibility of more AI conversations in the future.”
OK, lovelies, so that was my conversation with Gibson. If anyone's wondering why I call my ChatGPT - ChatGPT is a mouthful anyway – Gibson, after the sci-fi writer William Gibson. So anyone that knows William Gibson’s work will understand that reference. But yeah, that’s why I refer to ChatGPT as Gibson. Alright, I’m going to leave it right there. Let me know what you made of this conversation! Be sure, even if you just read my ‘Jay Likes Red’ posts, be sure to check out the Aquarian Insight posts because this was just the introduction to now an exploration of the unknown through certain archetypes. And I'm going to be talking more about the Great Attractor. That's going to be the next post. Love you guys. I will see you guys next time, but that's all for now. Goodbye!
Share this post